So do we believe the scientific data that says this is a well known problem or do we believe the false prophet fruitcakes that are still claiming the satellite data errors is a ufo (even though they now admit it "MAY BE" a data error?) ?
http://www.weatheroffice.gc.ca/satellite/composite_disclaimer_e.html
Canadian Arctic Composite Disclaimer
Data on this composite image ranges in time from that given by the header to several hours old.
This composite starts fresh each day with the data from the first pass of day placed on the map. The first pass typically covers the easterly portion of the map. Through the day new data replaces sections of old data or fits in areas not previously covered. The time between the newest and oldest data may by 4 - 6 hours. By midday most of the map is covered and some areas have had old data replaced several times. By end of day all but sections of east Greenland have data.
***********
http://www.upi.com/Security_Industry/200...198682331/print
Outside View: Arctic satellite balance
By YURY ZAITSEVUPI Outside View Commentator
Published: Dec. 26, 2007 at 10:18 AM
MOSCOW, Dec. 26 (UPI) -- Russian space industry experts are currently discussing the concept of a federal program to use the results of space research to aid national socioeconomic development.
The program envisions using a new satellite cluster, called "Arktika," to monitor weather conditions in the polar regions. President Vladimir Putin, who advocates the program, learned more about the new orbital system during his recent visit to the Lavochkin Research and Production Association -- NPO -- near Moscow.
Anatoly Perminov, director of the Federal Space Agency, Roskosmos, said Arctic research was highly important. In the last 15 years the national aerospace environmental monitoring system for the Arctic has virtually ceased to exist. The lack of authentic and up-to-date regional information makes it impossible to compile accurate weather forecasts for northern Russia and the world.
Major errors in statistical weather forecasts can be explained by initial data discrepancies. Most initial weather data for the Arctic regions comes from international geostationary satellites, which cannot effectively scan the Earth's high latitudes. Their angles of observation do not exceed 70 degrees, meaning they cannot effectively observe higher than 60 degrees of latitude north.
Nor are geostationary-satellite communications channels able to receive complete data from Arctic buoys and automatic weather stations. The Lavochkin NPO proposes to solve these problems by developing the highly elliptical weather-satellite system that would provide a picture of Arctic conditions.
article continues
------------------------------------------------
http://www.fivedoves.com/letters/oct2008/markc1018.htm
Mark Copfer (18 Oct 2008) "Re: Gina McCray"
Well, there are reports, and yes, its on google earth, as plain as day. You have to have check box in radar, and clouds. Anyways, whatever it is, ufo or not, its 100 times bigger than the huge ufo that flew over my head in March 1997. The bible is clear about what ufos or little green men are. They are fallen angels, the Nephliam if you will. I know what I saw 100-200 feet above my head in March 1997. I have it on video tape. But as far as google earth, the whole world has seen it, and its probably a software glitch. But this software glitch keeps moving . Look up near the north pole, and you will see it as plain as day... Again, probably just a software glitch. But if you look under yesterdays doves post, under my name, or the day before, John Tng posted a graphical picture of the object in google earth... Here is the link to the picture of the object http://www.fivedoves.com/letters/oct2008/GoogleEarth_Image.jpg
---------------------------------------------------------
Exposing false prophets and false prophecies of those who call themselves Christians
