.
"terrorists" threaten to blow up bridges and skyscrapers so maybe we should protest bridges and skyscrapers?
I remember when the enviromentalists were in support of nuclear power because it was "cleaner" than coal and oil. Recently the cuckoo enviromentalists were in support of wind turbines because it was "free and enviromentally safe" - until the birds started to get chopped up in them and now they are even protesting the wind turbines.
There are many safeguards in nuclear plants and it would take more than a casual plot to cause a problem in one. Even though drinking water supplies are easy targets, it is nearly impossible to cause a widespread "terrorist" attack on them. Nuclear plants are even harder for "terrorists" to get at - it would be much easier setting off a nuclear device or to anthrax, Ricin (castor beans obtained in the u.s.) or biologically attack a large area than to attack a nuclear power plant.
--------------------------------------
http://www.fivedoves.com/letters/march2009/jovial317-2.htm
Jovial (17 March 2009) "Warning!!!!"
There's a video at http://www.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=0861ff3eabea1ceb73e4 that discusses how Islamic terrorists are planning to smuggle chemical weapons into America and kill several hundred thousand Americans with an attack that will dwarf 9/11. It also talks about plans to bomb nuclear power plants. Terorrists see Nuclear power plants as a means of getting ltos of bang for their buck. This is why we should protest nuclear power. Terrorists are admitting that they see it as a perfect target. They only need to get one guy on the inside willing to die to have an EASY time of blowing one up.
------------------------------------------
Exposing false prophets and false prophecies of those who call themselves Christians
